Key Takeaways:
Tesla can be held liable in Autopilot-related accidents.
A Florida jury awarded $243 million after determining that Tesla’s Autopilot system contributed to a fatal crash, marking a major shift in how liability may be shared between drivers and automakers in semi-autonomous vehicle collisions.
Cybertruck crash and fire raise serious EV safety concerns.
Recent incidents, including a Cybertruck fire that trapped and killed a driver, highlight the potential dangers of electric vehicle design—especially when power failures prevent emergency escape.
EV and autonomous vehicle accidents involve complex legal liability.
As technology advances, victims may be able to pursue compensation not just from drivers, but also from manufacturers for defective design, unsafe software, or misleading marketing related to self-driving features.
Personal injury lawyers can help victims navigate EV accident claims.
Victims of Tesla or electric vehicle crashes may face complicated legal issues involving technology and product design.
An experienced personal injury attorney can help investigate liability, preserve crucial evidence, and fight for maximum compensation.
Tesla and EV Safety in the Spotlight
Tesla has dominated headlines recently – from a staggering $243 million jury verdict over a fatal Autopilot crash to a fiery Cybertruck accident that ended in tragedy. These incidents are raising tough questions about who is responsible when high-tech electric vehicles (EVs) crash. As electric cars become more common, unique safety and liability issues are emerging, especially concerning electric vehicle EV accident risks, fire hazards, and the legal complexities these vehicles introduce.
In this blog, we’ll dive into what happened in the Florida trial and the Cybertruck fire, and explore what these cases mean for the future of accident liability in the age of Teslas, self-driving features, and EVs. We’ll also address the specific risks and legal questions that set electric cars apart from traditional vehicles. Buckle up as we explore the road ahead for drivers, Tesla, and the law.
A Landmark $243M Verdict in a Tesla Autopilot Crash
A Florida jury’s decision in August 2025 sent shockwaves through the automotive and legal worlds. The jury found Tesla partially liable in a 2019 crash involving a Model S on Autopilot – and awarded a $243 million verdict to the victims. This is a huge deal because it’s one of the first times Tesla has been hit with such a judgment over its semi-autonomous driving technology.
The jury’s verdict suggests they believed something was wrong with Autopilot in this case. Tesla claims that its Autopilot system is safe and reliable, but these claims have come under increasing legal and regulatory scrutiny, especially as incidents and lawsuits challenge the accuracy of Tesla’s statements about the capabilities of their driver-assistance features.
What Happened in the Florida Case?
The case stemmed from a 2019 accident: a Tesla Model S, allegedly on Autopilot, blew through a stop sign and red light at about 62 mph, crashing into a parked vehicle on the road. Two people who had been standing by their car – Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo – were struck. Leon tragically died (thrown 75 feet by the impact) and Angulo suffered serious injuries, which may have long-term implications and require ongoing legal and medical attention. The Tesla’s driver had reportedly dropped his phone and didn’t see the intersection in time. Importantly, Tesla’s Autopilot did not alert or prevent the crash – even though Autopilot was designed mainly for highway use, it was being used on city streets.
In the trial, jurors decided Tesla bore 33% of the blame for the crash, with the driver responsible for the other 67%. Tesla wasn’t the only one at fault, but the company was ordered to pay the portion of damages corresponding to its share of fault (about $42.6 million in compensatory damages) plus a whopping $200 million in punitive damages. Punitive damages are meant to punish and send a message – and here, the message was clear: the jury believed something was seriously wrong with how Tesla’s Autopilot functioned or was marketed. As one expert noted, “We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash”, meaning the jury must have found a defect in the Autopilot system or its design.
Tesla’s Response and the Impact on Future Cases
Tesla, for its part, disagrees strongly with the verdict and has vowed to appeal. The company insists that Autopilot was not the real cause. In a statement, Tesla argued “no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash”, maintaining that the human driver was entirely at fault and that blaming Autopilot was “a fiction concocted by plaintiffs’ lawyers”. Elon Musk’s company essentially said that the driver admitted to being distracted, so in Tesla’s view, it’s unfair to hold the car responsible.
Despite Tesla’s stance, this verdict is being called a potential turning point. Legal experts say it’s the first major trial loss for Tesla involving Autopilot, and it “could encourage more legal action against [the] electric vehicle company.” Many prior lawsuits over Tesla’s self-driving capabilities were settled or dismissed before reaching a jury. Now that a jury has actually found Tesla partly liable, other victims of Autopilot-related crashes may feel emboldened to have their day in court.
“It’s a big deal,” said Alex Lemann, a law professor, noting this is the first time Tesla has been hit with such a judgment for an Autopilot fatality. The case could set a legal precedent and possibly make future settlements more costly for Tesla. As more cases go to trial and liability is established, insurance company involvement in EV accident claims and lawsuits is also likely to increase.
From a business perspective, the verdict is also a public relations blow to Tesla’s push for autonomous driving. Elon Musk has been touting Tesla’s Full Self-Driving technology and even launching a robotaxi venture, betting that autonomy is Tesla’s future. A high-profile loss in court – with jurors essentially concluding Autopilot had a defect or unsafe design – casts doubt on those self-driving claims. It might slow down public and investor confidence in Tesla’s autonomous ambitions.
Human Drivers Still on the Hook
It’s worth noting the Florida jury didn’t let the human driver off the hook – they found him mostly responsible, though he wasn’t a defendant in this civil trial. In fact, drivers who misuse Autopilot can face serious consequences. In California, prosecutors brought what’s believed to be the first-ever felony charges against a driver for a fatal crash while using a partially automated system. In that case, a Tesla Model S on Autopilot ran a red light at 74 mph in Gardena (Los Angeles County) and slammed into another car, killing two people.
A judge ruled the driver will stand trial for vehicular manslaughter. Data showed the Autopilot was engaged and the driver’s hands were on the wheel but no brakes were applied in the six minutes before the crash. This tragic incident serves as a warning: even with Autopilot on, the human must remain attentive, or they could be held criminally liable. As authorities noted, drivers cannot just rely on these systems to avoid accidents. In other words, Tesla’s manuals and statements (and even California law) maintain that Autopilot is not a “self-driving” car – it’s an assist that still requires an alert driver.
Regulators are watching as well. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has been investigating dozens of Tesla crashes where Autopilot or advanced driver aids were suspected of playing a role. In one such probe, NHTSA looked into a 2022 crash in Newport Beach, California (Orange County) where a Tesla Model S, possibly on Autopilot, slammed into construction equipment on Pacific Coast Highway, killing three people.
It’s part of a wider investigation into at least 35 Tesla-involved crashes since 2016 where driver-assist systems like Autopilot were thought to be in use. At least 14 deaths have been reported in those investigations. The safety agency has even opened a formal defect evaluation of Autopilot due to over a dozen collisions with emergency vehicles stopped on roads. All of this shows that Tesla’s technology is under intense scrutiny from both courts and regulators.
Tragic Tesla Cybertruck Fire Highlights EV Design Flaws
Just as Tesla grapples with Autopilot issues, another saga is unfolding with its latest vehicle. The Tesla Cybertruck, an electric pickup with a futuristic angular design, only hit the roads in late 2023 – and already it’s under a safety microscope. Tesla vehicles, with their advanced driver-assistance systems and unique designs, are increasingly being examined for safety and accident liability. In 2024, a horrifying crash and fire involving a Cybertruck resulted in a driver’s death and multiple lawsuits. The incident raised questions about the truck’s design and how EV accidents can turn deadly in unexpected ways.
The Texas Cybertruck Crash and Lawsuit
In August 2024, a man named Michael Sheehan was driving a newly-released Tesla Cybertruck in Baytown, Texas, when the vehicle veered off the road at night. The truck struck a culvert and burst into flames, trapping Sheehan inside. He was unable to escape the burning vehicle and tragically died at the scene. What followed is now a legal battle: Sheehan’s family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Tesla in June 2025, alleging that Tesla’s design and manufacturing of the Cybertruck were negligent.
The lawsuit highlights a terrifying scenario. It claims that the crash itself was survivable, but the Cybertruck’s design was “defectively” unsafe. Specifically, the suit alleges that once the vehicle’s power was lost in the crash, the doors locked or could not be opened, effectively trapping the occupant inside the burning truck. It also argues Tesla failed to provide adequate warnings or instructions on how to escape in such an emergency.
In a gasoline car, a driver might simply unlock the door or someone outside could break a window – but advanced EVs often have electronic door handles or locks that may default to a locked position or require special knowledge to open manually. The Cybertruck’s futuristic door system is at the center of this controversy, with claims that it prevented Sheehan from getting out in time.
Equally notable, the Texas lawsuit is the first known case involving a fatal Cybertruck crash. Tesla only delivered the first Cybertrucks in late 2023, so this deadly incident has quickly put the vehicle’s safety in the spotlight. The suit doesn’t just target Tesla: it also names a local bar in Mont Belvieu, accusing them of over-serving alcohol to Sheehan (who was reportedly intoxicated), which contributed to the crash. This dram shop claim adds another layer, but the core of the case against Tesla is about product design.
The family is seeking over $1 million in damages, and a trial had not yet been set as of mid-2025. Injured victims in electric vehicle accidents, such as this one, have the right to pursue legal action and seek compensation for damages caused by alleged defects or negligence.
A Second Cybertruck Tragedy in California
Unfortunately, the Texas crash isn’t the only deadly Cybertruck incident. In California, just months after the Cybertruck’s release, three college students were killed in a Cybertruck crash and fire in the Bay Area community of Piedmont. The Cybertruck, packed with young passengers, crashed (circumstances still under investigation) and burst into flames, filling the cabin with smoke and fire. A fourth passenger survived only because a quick-thinking witness managed to pull him out of a window. The other three occupants couldn’t escape and died of smoke inhalation or burns. One victim’s family has since sued the driver’s estate and the vehicle’s owner, seeking answers and accountability.
Chillingly, accounts from that crash echo the Texas case: one attorney noted that a victim in the back seat was desperately trying to get out but “the door didn’t work. She couldn’t get out… What went wrong with that vehicle that prevented her from being able to exit?”. It’s a haunting question. Was it simply the intensity of the fire? A power failure locking the doors? Something about the Cybertruck’s unique design (it has heavy armor-like body panels and presumably hefty doors) that jammed after impact?
Investigators from the California Highway Patrol are examining the wreck, but it’s unclear what caused the fire in the first place. The pattern of victims unable to escape is drawing scrutiny from safety experts and will likely be a key issue in any litigation.
EV Battery Fires Burn Hot – and Raise Liability Issues
These Cybertruck incidents underscore a broader concern with electric vehicle accidents: battery fires. When a high-voltage EV battery, specifically the lithium ion batteries used in electric cars, is damaged, it can ignite in a thermal runaway fire that burns extremely hot – in the Texas crash, the fire was reportedly so intense (around 5,000°F) that even bones were charred. Fires involving EV batteries are also notoriously difficult for firefighters to extinguish, sometimes reigniting hours or days later and releasing toxic fumes.
This isn’t unique to Tesla, but Tesla’s vehicles have had several high-profile fires. The Cybertruck’s fire fatalities in its first year on the road are alarmingly high relative to other cars. These incidents highlight the broader fire risks associated with electric cars, raising concerns about the safety of electric vehicles in severe accidents. In fact, one analysis found that the rate of fire-related deaths in the Cybertruck’s initial year exceeded that of the infamous Ford Pinto, which became synonymous with dangerous fuel tank fires in the 1970s. This comparison – Pinto vs. Cybertruck – is making the rounds in the media and puts pressure on Tesla to prove that its design is not inherently unsafe.
Tesla has already had to issue some recalls on the Cybertruck. According to news reports, there were fixes for issues like faulty acceleration pedals and an exterior body panel that was at risk of detaching. These problems might seem unrelated to crashes and fires, but they show that as a completely new vehicle, the Cybertruck is undergoing growing pains.
On the positive side, when NHTSA crash-tested the Cybertruck’s occupant protection in late February 2025, it earned a five-star safety rating – the highest possible. That indicates the truck performed well in controlled crash tests for protecting occupants. However, real-world accidents like the ones in Texas and California reveal scenarios that go beyond standardized tests: how does the vehicle fare in an off-road collision with a fire? Can occupants escape if something goes wrong? Those questions remain, and the legal system will be one venue to get answers.
Electric Car Accidents and Causes
As electric vehicles (EVs) become a more common sight on our roads, electric vehicle accidents are drawing increased attention from drivers, regulators, and insurance companies alike. Unlike traditional car accidents, electric car accidents often involve distinct challenges due to the advanced technology and high voltage systems that set EVs apart from conventional vehicles. Understanding what causes electric vehicle accidents is essential—not just for preventing future crashes, but also for determining liability when something goes wrong.
Electric vehicles EVs are equipped with advanced driver assistance systems, high voltage batteries, and unique design features that can influence how accidents occur and how severe the outcomes may be. As more drivers make the switch to electric vehicles, it’s important to recognize the factors that make these accidents different from traditional car accidents, and what that means for establishing liability.
Unique Risks of Electric Vehicles
Electric vehicles pose several unique risks that can contribute to accidents and injuries. One of the most notable is their silent operation. Unlike gasoline-powered cars, EVs make very little noise at low speeds, which can increase the risk of pedestrian accidents—especially for children, the elderly, and those with visual impairments who rely on sound to detect approaching vehicles.
Another key factor is the reliance on advanced driver assistance systems, such as adaptive cruise control and automatic emergency braking. While these features are designed to enhance safety, they can sometimes malfunction or be misunderstood by drivers, potentially leading to accidents. For example, if automatic emergency braking fails to detect a stationary vehicle ahead, or if adaptive cruise control does not respond appropriately to changing traffic conditions, a crash can occur.
Perhaps the most serious risk unique to electric vehicles is the potential for battery fires. The high voltage batteries that power EVs can ignite if damaged in a collision, leading to fires that burn at extremely high temperatures and are difficult for emergency responders to extinguish. These battery fires not only endanger vehicle occupants but can also pose risks to first responders and bystanders.
In summary, electric vehicles pose a combination of risks—silent operation, reliance on advanced driver assistance systems, and the presence of high voltage batteries—that require both drivers and manufacturers to be vigilant in preventing accidents and ensuring safety.
Common Factors Behind EV Crashes
While electric vehicles introduce new risks, many of the common causes of electric vehicle crashes are similar to those seen in traditional vehicles. Driver error remains a leading factor—distraction, speeding, and failure to obey traffic laws can all result in EV accidents. However, the advanced technology in electric vehicles can sometimes create a false sense of security. Features like autopilot systems or enhanced cruise control may lead drivers to become complacent, taking their attention off the road and increasing the risk of a crash.
Mechanical failures and manufacturing defects are also important contributors to electric vehicle accidents. Issues such as battery defects, improper maintenance, or problems with the vehicle’s software or hardware can all play a role. For example, a defect in the high voltage battery could lead to a sudden loss of power or even a fire, while a malfunction in the driver assistance system could cause the vehicle to behave unpredictably.
Environmental conditions, such as wet or icy roads, can further complicate matters, especially if the vehicle’s sensors or systems are not calibrated to handle such situations. In some cases, improper maintenance—such as failing to update software or service high voltage components—can increase the risk of mechanical failures and accidents.
Ultimately, electric vehicle crashes are often the result of a combination of human error, technological limitations, and potential defects. Understanding these factors is crucial for both preventing accidents and determining liability when they do occur.
Accident Investigation and Analysis
When an electric vehicle accident occurs, investigating the cause is often more complex than with conventional vehicle accidents. The advanced technology in EVs means that accident investigators must look beyond the usual factors and dig into the vehicle’s data, including information stored in the Tesla app and other onboard systems. This detailed analysis is essential for determining what happened, who or what was at fault, and how similar accidents can be prevented in the future.
Electric vehicle accidents require a multi-faceted approach to investigation, taking into account not only the actions of the driver but also the performance of the vehicle’s advanced systems. This is especially important in cases involving injuries sustained in severe accidents, where establishing liability can hinge on understanding the interplay between human and machine.
How EV Accidents Are Investigated
The process of investigating electric vehicle accidents involves a thorough examination of both the vehicle and the circumstances surrounding the crash. One of the first steps is to retrieve and analyze data from the vehicle’s onboard systems, which can include everything from speed and steering inputs to the status of the autopilot software and hardware at the time of the accident. The Tesla app and similar platforms can provide valuable insights into the vehicle’s recent activity, including charging history, system alerts, and even video footage from onboard cameras.
Regulatory agencies like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) play a critical role in investigating EV accidents, especially when advanced driver assistance systems or autonomous driving features are suspected of contributing to the crash. Investigators may review data from ultrasonic sensors, cameras, and other vehicle systems to reconstruct the sequence of events and determine whether the vehicle or the driver—or both—were responsible.
In addition to analyzing the vehicle’s data, investigators will also consider the actions of other vehicles involved, road conditions, and any potential mechanical failures or manufacturing defects. By piecing together all available evidence, they can identify the root causes of electric vehicle accidents and recommend changes to improve safety.
This comprehensive approach not only helps determine liability in individual cases but also informs future regulations and safety standards for electric vehicles. As EV technology continues to evolve, so too will the methods used to investigate and analyze these increasingly complex accidents.
The Future of EV and Autonomous Vehicle Accident Liability
Taken together, the Autopilot trial and the Cybertruck fire cases highlight how the legal landscape for car accidents is evolving in the era of advanced technology. Traditional car crashes usually boil down to driver error, maybe a manufacturing defect (like a brake failure), or sometimes road conditions.
But with Teslas and other modern cars, we now have to consider software decisions, marketing promises, and design choices that can all play a role in an accident. So, who’s liable when a high-tech car crashes? The answer is increasingly complex. Electric vehicle accidents also present unique legal and insurance challenges due to their advanced technology, including specialized components like batteries and charging systems, which can affect safety features, liability, and repair costs.
Here are a few key factors shaping the future of accident liability with Teslas, EVs, and autonomous vehicles:
Human vs. Autopilot
Shared Fault: As seen in the Florida case, fault may be shared between the driver and the technology. A jury found Tesla’s Autopilot was partially to blame, even though a human was behind the wheel. Going forward, we might see more cases where plaintiffs argue that a driver-assistance system should have prevented an accident or misled the driver into complacency. However, autopilot technology, which automates functions like adaptive cruise control and emergency braking, carries risks and limitations—overreliance on these systems can lead to accidents, and drivers must remain attentive at all times.
Tesla markets its Autopilot and “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) features as cutting-edge, and while the company does warn drivers to stay alert, critics say the branding has been too optimistic. (In fact, California passed a law in 2023 banning automakers from advertising a car as “self-driving” if it’s not fully autonomous, a rule clearly aimed at Tesla’s use of the term “Full Self-Driving.”) If a company overstates what its tech can do, it could face liability for misrepresentation if drivers rely on those claims and something bad happens.
Product Design and Defects
The Cybertruck lawsuits focus on product liability – alleging a defect in design (doors that won’t open without power, for example) made the injuries worse than they otherwise would have been. Product liability law allows victims to sue manufacturers if a design or manufacturing flaw in the vehicle contributed to the harm.
Expect to see more of these claims with EVs: for instance, were the battery packs insufficiently protected, leading to fires? Did the manufacturer fail to provide an emergency manual door release or proper instructions? Another unique feature in many electric vehicles is regenerative braking, which converts kinetic energy into electricity during braking to improve energy efficiency and vehicle safety, but may also introduce new considerations for accident liability. These are design questions that juries may have to evaluate.
Tesla’s lawyer in the Autopilot case argued “Tesla deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using Autopilot on roads it wasn’t suited for”, while Elon Musk boasted that Autopilot was safer than a human driver. Such evidence can sway jurors to decide a design was unreasonably dangerous. Going forward, carmakers might be pushed to add more safeguards – or face big payouts if they don’t.
Regulatory Changes
Laws and regulations are racing to catch up with the technology. Federal agencies like NHTSA are actively investigating and can force recalls if a systemic problem is found (for example, if Autopilot has a defect leading to crashes, or if Cybertruck doors prove hazardous). On the state level, we mentioned California’s ban on misleading “self-driving” ads.
Some states have also started updating their vehicle codes for self-driving cars. California and Nevada, for now, explicitly place accident liability on the “operator” (human) of an autonomous vehicle – meaning legally, the person in the driver’s seat is responsible, not the manufacturer. This makes sense during this transition period: as long as cars are not truly driverless, the human is expected to be in control. However, other states are experimenting with different ideas.
Tennessee, for example, passed an “Automated Vehicles Act” stating that when a car is in full autonomous mode, the automated driving system itself is considered the driver for liability purposes. In theory, that could shift responsibility to the manufacturer or software provider once cars are fully self-driving. We’re not quite there yet for consumer cars, but the laws are laying the groundwork.
When Cars Truly Drive Themselves
What happens as technology advances towards genuine Level 4 or 5 autonomy (where a car can drive with no human intervention)? Many experts believe that once a vehicle is certified truly autonomous, liability will shift more to the manufacturer, similar to product liability for a defective product. Some car companies have even said they would accept liability in such cases.
But until then, we’re in a murky middle ground. Insurers and courts will look at who had control at the time of the crash. Was the human driver monitoring and able to intervene? If yes, they’ll likely be at least partly responsible if they didn’t act. If the situation was such that no reasonable driver could have prevented it (because the system failed in a way beyond human control), then plaintiffs will argue the vehicle’s design was at fault.
Each accident will need careful investigation of the tech data (logs, camera footage) to see if it was human error, tech error, or a combination. As one former NHTSA administrator put it, there will come a crash where it’s undetermined who or what is at fault – and that’s where the difficulty begins.
Protecting Consumers and Victims
Ultimately, the goal of the legal system here is to encourage safer technology and fair compensation when people are harmed. Robust safety features in electric vehicles, such as lane assist, blind-spot monitors, and regenerative braking, play a critical role in preventing accidents and protecting occupants. If lawsuits reveal a dangerous flaw, it pressures companies to fix it. On the other hand, automakers worry about excessive litigation slowing down innovation. It’s a delicate balance.
For now, if you’re a driver using these advanced features, the takeaway is don’t treat your car as fully self-driving yet – legally and practically, you’re expected to stay alert. Tesla’s own user agreement says you must keep your hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. And if, sadly, an accident does occur, know that there may be unique legal issues involved. Preserving evidence (like the car’s data logs and any video) can be crucial in figuring out what went wrong and who is accountable.
In the Driver’s Seat of a New Era
Tesla’s recent courtroom and real-world fires remind us that we’re in a new era of driving – one foot on the accelerator of innovation, and one foot still planted in traditional rules of the road. The $243 million verdict shows that juries are willing to hold tech companies accountable if their self-driving features aren’t as safe as advertised. The Cybertruck fires highlight that even a cutting-edge design must still meet age-old expectations of safety, like allowing people to escape a wreck.
For drivers in California and beyond, it’s important to stay informed. If you drive a Tesla or any car with advanced driver assistance, use it wisely. These tools can help – but they do not make you invincible or free of responsibility. And for everyone else on the road, including pedestrians and cyclists, the advent of autonomous tech means we all have to be aware that a car next to us might not react the way a human would.
From an Orange County freeway to a Texas backroad, accidents with EVs and autonomous features are happening here and now. As personal injury attorneys, we are watching these developments closely. The legal framework is catching up: legislators, safety agencies, and courts are crafting rules and precedents that will define who pays when a self-driving dream turns into a nightmare. It’s a fast-evolving field, and each case – like Tesla’s trial or the Cybertruck lawsuits – will shape the road ahead.
Tesla’s trials (both legal and literal) are teaching tough lessons about accountability. The future of accident liability will likely be a mix of driver responsibility and manufacturer responsibility, shifting more toward the latter as cars gain more autonomous capabilities.
Safety, Accountability, and the Road Ahead
If you or someone you love has been injured in a Tesla accident or any self-driving/EV-related crash, know that you are not alone and you have options. These cases can be daunting – they pit individuals against powerful corporations and involve technical details that can feel overwhelming.
That’s where we at RMD Law come in. Our personal injury attorneys stay on the cutting edge of automotive technology cases, from Autopilot crashes to EV fires. We understand the unique challenges that come with tech-related car accidents, and we know how to fight for your rights. Whether it’s working with top-notch experts to prove a product defect or navigating the insurance complexities, our goal is to empower you and get you the compensation you deserve.
Accountability and safety go hand-in-hand; by pursuing your case, you’re not just seeking justice for yourself, but potentially driving change that makes vehicles safer for everyone. If you have questions about a crash involving Tesla’s Autopilot, a Cybertruck, or any other advanced vehicle system, call RMD Law for a free, no-obligation consultation. We’ll listen to your story, explain your legal options in plain language, and help you chart the best path forward.
When technology is at play, a crash isn’t just an accident; it’s a complex event with many potential causes – and knowing your rights is the first step to navigating the aftermath. Contact RMD Law today at (949) 828-0015 for a free, no obligation consultation with one of our pedestrian accident attorneys.
